The Foundation And Benchmarks Of Law

00:00 /

Frank O’Collins is the founder of Ucadia. He has for many years, provided instruction and teaching with particular emphasis on law and the corruption of true, divine law. The following recent (Sept 9th 2014) presentation by Mr O’Collins should prove to be both stimulating and informative and can be listened to or read or both.


STOP! Before you do or say anything in Court – here is the foundation and benchmarks of Law


Hello, this is Frank O’Collins for Tuesday 9th September 2014 and thank you for taking the time to read and listen to the Ucadia blog for this week entitled “STOP! Before you do or say anything in Court – Here is the foundation and benchmarks of Law”

By foundations I mean the cornerstone & pillars upon which something is built. Even the most complex and elaborate of systems must have some sort of foundation or else it would not and could not survive for a few weeks, much less several centuries.

By benchmarks, I mean a measure by which we can establish some sort of perspective or some sense of what is happening and what is supposed to happen.

By foundation and benchmarks of Law, I mean those absolutely essential elements to the operation of any and every Western-Roman Court on planet Earth today. I also mean those benchmarks and measures of Law from the time of Babylon and Hammurabi, through to Alexander the Great and then the Roman Emperors right through to the time of Constantine the Great and even up to the time of Charlemagne in the 9th Century CE.

The reason I want to speak with you about the foundation and benchmarks of Law today is to help you and everyone who comes to face the real and often frightening experience of having to go to one of the Private Courts run by the Private Bar Guild according to their Private Regulations.

Now, I know when I say Private Courts and terms such as the Private Bar Guilds, there will be some that roll their eyes and say “stop saying nonsense. The courts are public institutions” – which is a half-truth. Yes the courts in most countries were established as public institutions, but in the case of all British Colonies since the end of the 19th Century (e.g. 36&37Vict.c.66) especially in the United States since the Civil War (Supreme Court of District Columbia), the courts have been private corporations, regulated by parliaments or congress. I will prove it to you in black and white evidence as we go along.

Nor am I about to start dishing out legal advice about the Private Regulations of these Private Courts of the Private Bar Guilds. I am not a member of their secret fraternity – although many of my family were and some still are. Nor am I privy to the latest amendments, re-writes, repeals of such Private Regulations – constantly changing and corrupting their own laws to maintain their advantage. But I certainly will be showing you the original instruments such as the Judicature Procedures Act of 1875 (36&37Vict. c.77) [and the earlier constitution of Supreme Court (36&37Vict.c.66)] that started these regulations as a benchmark to prove these Private Guilds don’t even follow their own rules, much less anything resembling the true rule of law.

So whatever you might be thinking this minute about the blog tonight, please do not be alarmed. I am not going to bombard you with a tsunami of facts and statutes. That would defeat the purpose of this blog. This blog is about regaining some perspective and finding some sense. It is about finding clarity and not about making people more confused.

I realize how daunting it is facing these public buildings hijacked for Private and Secret Business. You may appear with an attorney or under your own cognizance. Then there is the person claiming to be a judge or justice or magistrate – in British dominions in the higher courts dressed in the formal red mantle vestments signifying the claimed ecclesiastical authority of the Vatican and the Roman Catholic Church. In the lower courts, the black and purple robes of a clerk or registrar in Admiralty and Ecclesiastical Causes, often with a red sash from the left shoulder to right hip signifying the clerical authority of the Privy Council.

For most of us who are not members of this secret world, there is no explanation as to the symbolism, or the claimed authority. Nor is there a clear text that defines all the laws in operation in a court, or all the procedures and documents and details – despite the false claim that such procedures and documents are contained within their published procedures – this is only the tip of the iceberg.

No wonder then that when people are faced with the trauma of having to go to court to defend their rights to still see their own biological children, or save their family home, or stop their life savings from being seized or seek some clemency against some horrendous and hugely unjust fine that so many look for some form of relief, or remedy or answer on the Internet – often getting themselves into more trouble.

To make matters worse, the mantra of the tricksters and the secret fraternities remain – “There is remedy, only if you follow the correct procedure” – again leading to people searching for whatever the hell this “correct procedure” is. The fact the whole court system is so shrouded in mystery and occult symbolism and half-truths absolutely lends itself for people getting tricked and often badly hurt by false information.

So tonight is about redressing some of this imbalance by reviewing fundamental foundational and benchmark concepts – so that no one, absolutely no one, who is facing a Court issue should ignore or forget these critical truths.

So with this in mind, let’s get started with remembering the most important of all foundations of Law – being what the Law is.

What is true Law?

Someone can tell you to do something – but does that make it a law? Maybe if they are armed and that gun is pointed at you- then they might have the power to enforce their command, but does it make it just?

For example, the distinction between a true Christian and an apostate or heretic or imposter is very simple – A true Christian is someone who puts the words and teachings of Jesus Christ above all other teachers and prophets. Sounds simple right?

So someone who places the words of Paul the Apostle as more important than the words of Jesus is not a true Christian – because they have willingly or ignorantly diminished the words of Jesus against some other teacher, prophet or saint. Similarly, someone who puts the words of the Popes, or a Preacher above the words attributed to Jesus in the Gospels can never be considered a true Christian – because they believe the words of the Preacher or Pastor or Pope above those of Jesus.

Now as simple as this sounds, for some reason people continue to get themselves all messed up about religion and religious messages where they claim to be Christian on the one hand, yet place the words of Jesus at the bottom of the pile and then the words of their Pastor, Priest or the Pope at the top, followed by media personalities and then Old Testament prophets.  So if people cannot follow such a simple, unmistakable benchmark that to be a true Christian is to place the words of Jesus above all others, then no wonder the world is such a mess.

The same applies with the law. For thousands and thousands of years, various cultures from all over the planet Earth were founded on the same essential benchmark called the Golden Rule of Law- that all are equal before the law and none is above the law.

It sounds like a simple benchmark right? It is. It is as simple as the benchmark about being a true Christian I just mentioned. So in the case of the law – any law that gives one group an advantage over the others cannot be considered a true law. And any law that grants immunity for one group to commit criminal acts while punishing another larger group for the same thing again cannot be considered true law.

So knowing this benchmark, which I have mentioned in dozens of blogs should make identifying what is law and what is not true law easy- if it does not honor the Golden Rule of Law, then it is not true law, no matter how emphatic the media or messenger.

Just to prove the point. Let’s just say you are a true Christian for a moment and not an apostate or heretic or imposter and you are having a discussion with another true Christian. If the words of Jesus are to be considered above all others, then any key words by Jesus concerning the law should be even more important right?

So would you not agree that the most important message of Jesus in all the gospels concerning Law should be arguably the most important message for any official of a claimed Christian or Western Society?

Guess what? It is relatively easy to identify the most important passage concerning law in all four gospels and it is found within the Sermon on the Mount at Matthew 7: 12, where Jesus said in conclusion, “Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law of the prophets.” (KJV), – that “all are equal under the law” or “do unto others as it may be done to you”. As you know, we call this the Golden Rule of Law.

Within the very context of this most important and significant verse we see Jesus identify the Law as having been consistently taught by the prophets from time immemorial.  In other words the concept that the Golden Rule of Law was historically accepted at the time of Jesus and previous was indicated by what Jesus said, “…for this is the law of the prophets” and is memorialized in this verse within the Gospel of Matthew to stand as the beacon for the foundation and benchmark of ALL LAW.

What is true Justice?

Lets take another example to see another key benchmark in Law- the foundational concept of Justice: For example, someone dressed in robes can sit in a high chair above all others in a chamber and claim they are the only honorable man or woman in good standing within such a registry.

Of course, a name plaque doesn’t make a man a judge and robes or being deliberately elevated above everyone else does not make a woman a justice or magistrate. These are theatrical diversions and grotesque illusions at law and have nothing to do with true law or Justice.

Only a man or woman, who pledges a sacred oath in good faith, good character and good conscience to perform the obligations of an Office can be a true Officer of Law.  That is not simply an indisputable and absolute fact that has been present in every civilized society until the past 150 years, it is also a logical act. It is the oath or vow done with the right intention that creates the Office – not some stupid piece of paper, or dressing up in robes, or being endorsed by some secret society.

The very fact that a judge or magistrate refuses to disclose any proof of their oath of office; the very fact that justices in England and British Dominions attend the Red Mass to disavow and abjure all oaths against themselves is a blatant ritual proving they have absolutely no authority under the law, except by force or intimidation or fear. The fact that some judges even perform the Kol Nidre Prayer is proof they have no clue that they do not hold any Office of a Judge because their complete stupidity and sacrilege before heaven, destroyed the binding that created such Office.

You don’t need to be a legal expert to live your life in respect, in honesty, in courage and enthusiasm and compassion. You don’t need to sign up for some legal remedy on the internet to discover the founding principles of justice is to simply be a decent man or woman. Not to seek revenge. Not to abuse and misuse the law for personal gain. Nor to be fearful against pirates and imposters.

Justice is in essence the proper administration of Rights by Officers of the Law. So now we have considered the Office component and the fact that the existing system you face has no true office holders, lets have a look at Rights.

If you haven’t already gone and had a look at the Covenant Pactum de Singularis Caelum on the site One-Heaven.Org., then go and have a look at the subject of Rights – particularly those rights bestowed to you by the Divine Creator which can never be taken away, or lost or sold or surrendered. Then go and have a look at the blogs I did earlier this year on the issue of Rights and the fact that these Private Bar Guilds created all kinds of bizarre pseudo rights for themselves in complete contradiction to the Golden Rule of Law.

No one can steal or purchase your soul. People who keep pushing that crap really have got to get a better con-artist routine – because people will eventually read and hear and realize it is the same fear mongering and bullshit that has kept the existing system running for centuries.

Now if you want benchmarks on Rights, then go and read the Declaration of Independence, or the Magna Carta or the Bill of Rights. These documents are supposed to still be the foundation stones and benchmarks of their own system. Yet they do not honor them, or follow anywhere near the intent of these instruments.

What is true Procedure?

Let’s take another example of foundations and benchmarks, being procedure: For example, how can someone be considered guilty until the charge be proven? To render someone guilty just by the mere accusation is the height of absurdity and flies in the face of all fair process of law for thousands of years.

And yet, this principle is behind every speeding ticket, every parking fine, every charge before a magistrates court since the changes to Justice and the operation of the courts in the mid 19th century and then streamlined at the end of the 19th century.

The mere processing of a charge by someone holding some official status, usually by some kind of “letter of marque” is enough for the commercial wheels of law to start processing away on the assumption one is guilty unless we prove some extenuating circumstances – and even then it is more akin to an appeal than it is a case of negative averment of disproving the accusation.

Think about it for a second- there is absolutely no fairness in procedure if one is already considered guilty before the evidence of the charge has even been entered or heard or tested. Not even the alleged witches of Salem faced such tyranny – The Witch Trials of Salem were a veritable case study in high jurisprudence compared to modern American courts. I’m not being funny. I am being serious. The burning of witches hundreds of years ago at least gave the accused several opportunities to deny and defend themselves. In contrast most people get no change in modern commercial courts in America today to properly defend themselves.

The turning point when all law became procedure in Western-Roman Courts is toward the end of the 19th Century in 1875 with the Supreme Court Procedures Act (36&37Vict. c.77) which introduced a whole new concept of how the lower courts were to operate.

No longer was a Judge or Justice of Admiralty or Common Law to sit in a chamber. Instead, it was to be a Registrar of Ecclesiastical and Admiralty Causes and the Court was merely to be a Registry. That the strength of the paperwork was supposed to determine the validity of the charges.

The Registrar of Ecclesiastical and Admiralty Causes pretending to be a judge was to have the powers of Admiralty as well as the Privy Council and even the Archbishop of Canterbury at their disposal. But their job was not to judge the guilt or innocence of the accused but to weigh up all the documentation to decide how the matter might be enjoined in the court rolls – either in favour of the prosecution or the defense.

In other words a debt was created under this new procedure identified in the issue roll and all that the registrar had to determine was who had to pay it and any other penalties. Hence all law became commercial.

Have a look at the act (36&37Vict. c.77). It is an incredible piece of history.  It is the origin of all Federal Court Procedures and Rules. It is the first time that the modern procedures of the courts were defined, where debate and substance of law became irrelevant and procedure became everything. Law only becomes relevant again under appeal. The Registrar pretending to be a judge or justice or magistrate has no authority to give detailed opinions of the merits of the law, even though some of them over the decades now fancy themselves as jurists.

You are facing Pirates that don’t even follow their own Pirate Codes

Now remember the mantra of the remedy sellers and Internet law gurus that promise “there is remedy, only if you follow the proper procedure” – well, the 1875 Judicature Act (36&37Vict. c.77) is the birthplace of all procedure in their courts from that point on. All of it. So let’s compare the original framework of procedures from Westminster for the Private Bar Guild Courts and then compare them to modern rules and procedures of courts operating as for profit businesses – what do you see?

In one sense you see the continuation of the same basic form as proof of its origin and the origin of authority. But in another sense you also see that the modern corporate model of making money from crime through Privately controlled courts is out of control- because many courts have abandoned even these basic procedures of authority from the 19th century.

Modern courts don’t worry about issues of enjoinment at the end- they do it at the beginning and they don’t even worry about misjoinder as a fatal flaw- A misjoinder – that is a deliberate or mistaken failure to properly enjoin the parties is no obstacle to modern courts ploughing through to make money.

Just to be clear. The whole procedure of modern Western Law is about who owes the debt and therefore who is enjoined to the roll recording the issue. So when the modern courts simply ignore that step, they are ignoring and abusing and corrupting the most essential and fundamental concept of the 1875 Procedures act (36&37Vict. c.77) . Again, go and have a look at the dozens of pages of examples at the back of the act, designed to instruct and teach the Law Pirates how to behave. The modern courts are so broken, they have thrown all that out the window.

Nor is the absence of affidavits from the prosecution or proper grand jury indictments, or proper signatures any obstacle to the money making machine that are the modern courts.  These are not minor details and flaws- these are fundamental flaws in the procedural operation of Pirate Justice and the fact that the courts still condemn and destroy the lives of people without these steps being followed is proof that the Pirates now don’t even follow their own Pirate Codes.

So lets get it clear now.  Because as I said this blog is not about confusing people but hopefully making it completely clear – None of the courts in the Western-Roman Law honor the Golden Rule of Law, nor do the judges or justices or magistrates occupy any proper office under any form of proper oaths nor do they even care to follow their own procedures anymore.

So what can we do if there is no law, no justice or fair process?

This is where people get despondent and in a sense still rush off and sometimes do really stupid things. Because they still need to save their home, or get access to their children, or save their business, or defeat some enemy using the courts as a weapon.

So a paradox emerges because on the one hand there is all the evidence supporting our discussion and yet there are all these rumors and claims that people actually did win, or did succeed. So in a way it almost causes people to doubt the very foundations and benchmarks we discussed as being true.

For example, why do you never hear a remedy guru or Internet law salesman ever mention the Golden Rule of Law? Why?  I mean it is so fundamental. Also, why do people, once they hear it, often simply ignore it? Because people are desperate and are prepared in many cases to do anything that people tell them in the small hope they can save their home, or their wealth or their children from the pirates.

The only answer I have found in more than 21 years of research and in reading all of their statutes from 1216 to the present day and most acts of congress and acts of parliament of Australia is knowledge and competence. The answer is knowledge and competence. Once you know what something is, then you can move forward.

For example, if you read the 1875 Procedure Act, then you can see once and for all how their procedures are supposed to work – because this act is as much a training manual for the Private Bar Guilds formed across the world around the same time; and

If you go and read Article 69 of Positive Law, then you will know what Rights are about; and Article 17 about Person and Article 101 about Mortgage.

Once you read and become more knowleagable about even the corrupt system of non-law of the present Western-Roman system, you can start to see how this knowledge can help form opportunities for relief and remedy such as Article 98 of Fiduciary Law and Affidavits and how they work and Article 5 of Fiduciary Law on Trustee as well as Article 23 on Registers and Article 24 on Rolls and Article 33 on Records.

This is painstaking knowledge gleaned over years of research that is given to you without charge on the condition that you act honorably, sensibly and stop being stupid by following or believing the never ending flow of bullshit claimed remedies and relief on the Internet.

To be clear – the only true relief and remedy in a world of Pirates is Knowledge and Competence. That is it.

Thank you

Finally, there is a path forward beyond the steep level of reading and learning and it is the hope that communities based on respect of the Golden Rule of Law of true Justice and the Rights we have discussed are formed.

Beyond even the idea of just Grand Juries to the idea of autonomous and self governing communities that recognize the unique value and rights of each and every man and woman.  This is the basis of the Ucadia Campus model and from next week I am very excited after all these years to begin sharing with you more information on this.

So to all who continue to support Ucadia and help keep it going, thank you! Thank you for your support and trust and I look forward after all this time to being able to speak about the positive of being the ones we’ve been waiting for in enacting communities that respect the Golden Rule of Law and reclaiming our Rights and Dignity.

Cheers Frank.