The Art of faking hostile attacks and blaming them on the innocent:  Northwoods Project vetoed by JFK.  Admiral Lemnitzer was a Jew.

What do you think is going on in Syria, including sinking boatloads of refugees!!!

 

In Rightful Liberty

IF YOU WANT TO STOP MASS SHOOTINGS, SURRENDER YOUR GUNS

“Throw down your guns and come out with your hands up.” ~ Dialog from hundreds of Westerns and the current message from government to its citizens.

Why is it I feel like I’m living in the Twilight Zone and expect to hear Rod Serling start explaining events surrounding the latest mass shooting and the immediate response of government and media personnel exalting more gun control as the only answer before the bodies of those slain have assumed room temperature?

The folks doing research for Harvard and Northwestern university’s claim the rate of mass shootings has tripled since 2011. Of, course there are the political opportunists, especially those clothed in conservative garb, who claim Obama is responsible for this increase. Ah, but it’s not the people; it’s the machine.

What a merry-go-round this whole debacle has become. With every new mass shooting the pleas from government and the media (like there is an actual difference in their agendas) for more stringent gun control increases steadily just as gun sales reach new highs.  So, the question I am waiting for Mr. Serling to pose is this: are the citizens of this country more afraid of mass shooters or the government which wants to disarm them?

All governments become evil and tyrannical regardless of their benign beginnings. Ours is certainly no exception. Documented history of the 20th Century reveals governments during that period of time murdered over 200 million of their own citizens.

Another important question becomes: would governments plan and carry out crimes against its own citizens to further an agenda of control or to manufacture evidence for going to war? Is there empirical evidence of our government planning or participating in such an event? We must dig no deeper than “Operation Northwoods.” According to James Bamford, author of  BODY OF SECRETS,

“Code named Operation Northwoods, the plan, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.”

Let me repeat here for clarification two phrases from Bamford’s report on this government plan of action: “called for innocent people to be shot on American streets” and “a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere.” What about people being framed for bombings they did not commit?” Is this not what is happening now and has been happening with increased frequency in our country? What would lead any prudent individual to believe our government has become less tyrannical since this plan was formulated in the bowels of government back in the early 60’s?

It is well documented that people naturally want to believe what makes them feel good, regardless of any facts to the contrary. This is especially true of those who have assumed government as their lord and protector. Where is the evidence this government cares more for its citizens than it does those it refers to as its enemies? This government wants to disarm Iran, North Korea and its own citizens, but provides arms and training to ISIS.  Hmmm.

This government lied about not knowing the Japanese were coming to bomb Pearl Harbor; lied about the events surrounding the assassinations of JFK, RFK and MLK; it lied about the Gulf of Tonkin attacks; it lied about the OKC bombing; events surrounding the Boston Marathon bombing, WTC building number 7, and anyone who believes the passport of one Mohammed Atta could survive a crash into a WTC building on a plane loaded with fuel and land in pristine fashion atop the rubble of that debacle needs some serious counseling—or stronger meds.

Any trust in our government has to be based on a strong emotional need, for there is absolutely no factual evidence whatsoever on which to base a belief in the words or actions of government. Instead of questioning the motives of those referred to as “conspiracy theorists” should we not be questioning the motives of government and its employees?

Who profits from the horror of a mass shooting when the government begins proposing gun control before the bodies are cold? Who would use the dead and wounded to further an agenda? Where is the simple respect for those who were attacked? Is it to be found in proposing new laws that would leave even more people vulnerable to similar attacks?

Why would government want the people to be disarmed? Why does a member of government fear an armed citizen? Could it be they realize this ponzi scheme of borrowing money to the point the interest on the debt is more than the gross receipts of that government will be discovered by the citizens and they will seek retribution from those who sold them on this criminality? Is there a fear that when all draconian legislation they pass or have passed is discovered for what it really is, the people might actually resist?

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power, and jealousy will instantly inspire the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive.”  ~ Noah Webster

Mass shootings will continue to increase in volume, magnitude and the number of victims until the government achieves its goal of disarming the American people. Whether you choose to believe or not believe elements of the government are behind these acts of terror and criminality matters nothing; the events will continue regardless and there is nothing I can write that will change your mind if your basis for establishing truth rests on emotionalism rather than the facts of history and simple logic.

The basic fact remains: whether you are attacked by actual terrorists or by personnel participating in a false flag event, if you are unable to defend yourself and your loved ones, the weight of responsibility rests with you, not a government employee who will never arrive in time to save you or your family. There are a multitude of headstones in death orchards that prove my point.

“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, …” ~ Thomas Jefferson, Declaration of Independence.

In Rightful Liberty