Professor Truth and Pastor Eli James explain how the Bible is to be understood, based on the Book, The Great Impersonation, How the Anti-Christ Has Deceived the Whole World.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXHq61nc0bg&feature=youtu.be

Praise Yahweh for the TRUTH!

The Enmity, Part 1: The Two Bloodlines

And I [Yahweh] will put enmity between thee [nachash] and the woman [Eve], and between thy seed and her seed; it [her seed] shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his [her seed’s] heel.” — Genesis 3:15.

Introduction to the Series

“The Enmity” is intended to be a six-part series whose main subject is miscegenation. For the last 35 years, it has been apparent to me that the Bible is a document which records the vicissitudes of a particular race of people, namely: the Adamic White man. The message of the Bible is clear: Whenever Adam-man strays from his God-appointed duty to remain separate and distinct from other races, Adam-man suffers untold calamities. This racial separateness, although mandated by the Father Himself, is not quite absolute, as our nation has always been permitted to co-exist with other nations, but we are not to mix with them as individuals.  The Twelve Tribes of Israel, being His Chosen People, are to maintain our racial purity.   In conformity with this principle, the Founding Fathers of America had every intention that our society remain racially segregated.  The US Constitution, as written by them, did not recognize non-Whites as citizens.  The Jim Crow laws confirmed their intentions that racial integration is to remain forbidden.

It is also clear to me that, as we obey Yahweh’s laws, including His racial laws (“kind after kind”), other races become more attracted to us, because of our prosperity and Christian jurisprudence. This is part of God’s Plan for the restoration/healing of planet earth. This is the meaning of Jesus Christ when He tells us Israelites that we, Israel, are a “light unto the nations” and that we are to be the “city on the hill.”   When Yahweh instructs His People to “go in and possess the land,” He means for us to turn the wilderness into a paradise.  He also means to establish His government through us.  Throughout history, when we have done this, the standard of living of the indigenous and surrounding nations has improved, by virtue of the scientific and cultural improvements our people always make.   This is in clear fulfillment of the commandment the Yahweh gave us to take dominion on this planet.  (Gen. 1:28.) It is also clear that we are to remain aloof from the strangers of other races and always show preference to our kin.  This is where the politics of race comes in.  The Bible very clearly teaches that the Adamic Race is not to integrate with non-Whites.  We are to remain separate, so that we can fulfill our destiny as His Chosen People.  We cannot fulfill this destiny if we pollute and dilute our spiritual and intellectual capabilities through race-mixing.

It is my belief that these other nations are to learn from us while we, as a people,  enjoy God’s government, by obeying His laws. If we are not practicing God’s government, then we have nothing to teach them. If this sounds like the “White Man’s Burden,” then so be it. Kipling understood it as well as any other White man. But, obviously, if we do not ourselves obey Yahweh’s Laws, then we can hardly expect anyone to follow our example.

A modern parallel to this system was the Apartheid system of South Africa. This was a highly successful system of keeping our race separate while benefiting all races of the area. There are two undeniable facts about Apartheid (separateness): Black Africa never had it so good; and the collapse of apartheid has precipitated the total demise of civilization in Africa. Africa has essentially returned to its pre-colonial darkness. The kosher press has kept our people uninformed of the fact that most Blacks of the area preferred Apartheid to the ANC’s phony calls for equality. This same kosher press has kept a total blackout on the anti-White genocide that is currently going on in southern Africa. The African National Congress was a communist movement financed by Jewish money. Its purpose was to destroy the influence of the White Race (Anglo-Saxon Israel) in the region. The vast majority of Blacks were always in opposition to the ANC, but the “international community” supported the communists. Why? This battle is just one episode in the 6,000-year-old conflict of the ages: the war between the holy seed and the evil seed.

This evil seed, which is in total control of the mass media, insists that it has been victimized by the holy seed since time immemorial. Quite the opposite is the case. Wherever Israelites have settled, we have built prosperous civilizations, from the early days of city-states down to the Constitutional Republics of today. These prosperous civilizations were built without any assistance from the Jews or their predecessors, the Edomites and Canaanites. Once these civilizations have begun to flourish, the Jews have moved in with their usury and other vices, resulting in the decline and eventual destruction of same. In every single instance of our people’s decline, race-mixing has been a major part of the decline. This is true from our ancient stays in Palestine, through our city-states, such as Athens, Troy and Rome, down to our modern Anglo-Saxon nations.

>From the fall of Adam and Eve in the Garden, one particular enemy has dogged us unmercifully in order to corrupt our lifestyle and our very genetic make-up. This race-mixer entered the Garden and seduced Eve. This race-mixer was present on this earth before Adam; and Adam was warned of his presence. In Hebrew, he was known as ‘nachash,’ the whisperer, a name implying secret seductions, like illicit sex and illegal drug deals. He was the tempter of Eve then and he is still our tempter today. But the Judeo-Christian corruption of the Hebrew Scriptures has ensured that we remain in our fallen state. He, nachash, got us to adulterate our seed, and, as a result, we live in constant misery.

In not-too-distant times, his children were known as the perfidious Jews. In the last 6,000 years, his methods of corrupting us have not changed at all. His purpose has always been to destroy the doctrine of separateness which Yahweh has instituted for our benefit and the world’s benefit. But we are dealing with a very sly, sophisticated enemy who fully understands that our success is his downfall. Just as a biological parasite thrives on its host, the Jew has always thrived on the Saxon’s culture. His method against us has always been to keep us in a state of disease-ridden confusion. “The Enmity” is an attempt at providing a concise history of the nearly eternal conflict between these two seedlines.

This commandment that Israel should remain separate from other ethnic groups is stated repeatedly throughout all of Scripture. The fact that most White Christians are unaware of this teaching is due to the fact that they don’t read their own Bibles. They have allowed the heretical priesthood of “Judeo-Christianity” to tell them what the Bible says. These priests are Christian Pharisees who choose verses that fit their theology and reject verses don’t. Scientists do the same thing with facts and theories.

Here is what the Bible teaches:

“…and all they that separated themselves from the people of the lands unto the law of God, their wives, their sons, and their daughters, every one having knowledge and having understanding; They clave to their brethren…And we would not give our daughters unto the people of the land, nor take their daughters for our sons.” — Nehemiah 10:28-30.

I know that some who are reading this will get a queasy feeling in their stomachs. It’s that knee-jerk, Beast-promoted reaction to the word ‘race’ that is making your stomach queasy. But we absolutely must come to grips with the fact that our race has been targeted for enslavement by a self-chosen minority. If we do not, then we are doomed to annihilation as a species. Note that your typical Fundamentalist preacher will never quote the above passage or the other hundreds that declare our separateness and exclusivity.

Be ye therefore wise as serpents, yet gentle as doves.” — Matt. 10:16.

Have you ever wondered why any attempts by Whites at self-preservation are always referred to as “racism” or “anti-Semitism”? The fact is that White people just want to be left alone so as to pursue their destiny; but the Jews won’t leave us alone. Like a pestilence, they have followed us wherever we have gone. Deep within their genetic make-up, they know that they cannot survive without us. This is the intense love-hate relationship that every parasite has towards its host. Despite Jewish accusations against us, we are not to confuse Separateness with Supremacism. Yahweh did not put us here to lord it over the other races. They were already here before we arrived. Our mission is one of restoration. Our mission is to exemplify Yahweh’s lawful system of justice here on earth.

Remember the Prime Directive of the Starship Enterprise? It was not to interfere in the natural development of other “worlds.” Our mission is not to lord it over the other races. Our mission is to cleanse the planet of the parasite that infected it long before we arrived so as to restore it to its natural state. Our problem is that we, the rescue team, have ourselves become infected.

 

Introduction to Part One, The Two Bloodlines

As a proud member of the Christian Identity Movement, I have to say that our movement has been produced by many great scholars, such as Howard B. Rand, Bertrand Comparet, Sheldon Emry, Reginald Dunlop, W. G. Finlay, Dr. Wesley Swift, William Gale, E. Raymond Capt and many others who have provided us with great service. This service consists in two main areas: biblical revisionism and historical revisionism. As such, Christian Identity is the ultimate revisionist movement, as it strives to understand our origins and purpose as a people, starting with the Book of Genesis. In addition, these scholars, and their contemporary counterparts, have delved into the natural history of this planet in an attempt to resolve the apparent contradictions between the Scriptural record and the scientific record. Here, a categorical claim must be made. This is a claim which sets Christian Identity apart from both the orthodox Christian world and apart from mainstream science, and that claim is this: The Bible does NOT contradict natural science. In spite of the popular perception that biblical history and natural history do not agree, nothing could be further from the truth. The situation is precisely this, that modern Fundamentalism is sorely lacking in historical and scientific knowledge or interest, and that modern science has been bogged down with a completely unscientific theory, namely, the Theory of Evolution. There is no way that these two false world views can be reconciled. One is anti-scientific and the other is phony science. Both world views suffer from extremely skewed interpretations of their subject matter.

 

Natural Selection

Why is the Theory of Evolution unscientific? As a former student in the chemistry curriculum at the University of Illinois, I understood exactly what a scientific theory consists of. A scientific theory must be based on observable facts and it must be testable. To be testable means that some scientist must be able to test a particular theory with a reproducible experiment. Anyone with suitable equipment should be able to test the theory by reproducing this experiment. The Theory of Evolution fails on both counts. First, it is not a theory in the sense that it explains any natural phenomena. Natural selection appears to explain physical events, but the reality is that the phrase “survival of the fittest” is not specific enough to qualify as a scientific hypothesis. It is, in essence, generalized guesswork, usually with a hidden political agenda, namely secular humanism. Second, it is not testable because it is too vague.

After finding the chemistry curriculum too difficult, I moved on to the Philosophy Department, where I specialized in Formal Logic, having spent 3 semesters in graduate school studying the derivation of formal logic systems and the derivation of mathematics from basic logical propositions. A basic part of this curriculum is the study of axioms and syllogisms. Axioms are the most fundamental of all logical propositions, such as the definition of the number 1. It may seem obvious to everyone what the number 1 means, but, for both philosophical and scientific analysis, specialists must have a working definition of numbers so that there is no confusion down the line. The question, “Does 1 + 1 really equal 2?,” is a very serious question; and this is the kind of question that the study of axioms deals with.

Syllogisms are a part of deductive (logical) and inductive (scientific) reasoning. A basic syllogism would be the following:

A. All Israelites are Shemites.
B. I am an Israelite.
C. Therefore, I am a Shemite.

A corollary to this syllogism is the proposition that “All Israelites are Shemites” but that “Not all Shemites are Israelites.” The essence of logical reasoning is precise definitions. Wars have been fought over misunderstandings caused by imprecise definitions. Within our own Movement, serious debates have turned to anger because words, such as ‘Jew’ and ‘Gentile,’ have different meanings to different people, and the result is that we are still living in the world of Babylon, which means “confusion.”

The Theory of Evolution, as it is presented to the public by its adherents, is deliberately misleading for several reasons. From the perspective of formal logic, it is unscientific because it does not state a testable proposition. In reality, “survival of the fittest,” although it sounds like a reasonable proposition, is not a testable proposition. This proposition is what the logicians call a tautology. A tautology is a proposition which is true by definition, not by physical evidence. The most basic form of a tautology is A = A or 1 = 1. Natural selection, or “survival of the fittest,” is in reality, a disguised form of tautology. Doris Day once had a hit song called “Que Sera, Sera.” It means “whatever will be will be.” Is that a scientific statement? No, it isn’t. And neither is “survival of the fittest.” Although “survival of the fittest” appears to be saying something about the real world, it is, in fact, merely making the logical deduction that fittest animals will survive.

What does “fit” mean? Many will say: “the biggest and the strongest.” But the dinosaurs were the biggest and the strongest. That didn’t help them survive. Others will say, “Intelligence is the key.” But mankind is the most intelligent, and we are destroying our own environment, ensuring our eventual self-destruction. Cockroaches get my vote for survivability, but even their existence is not guaranteed. Do you see how silly the phrase, “survival of the fittest,” really is? It says nothing more than “What will be will be.”

Neither Darwin nor any other evolutionist has ever proposed any experiment which would demonstrate how the genes of a particular species would be affected by natural events in order to produce a new species. The natural record shows very clearly that all species are capable of adaptation to physical circumstances, but not once in history has one species ever mutated into an entirely different species. This has never happened; no experiment has ever demonstrated its possibility; and the study of genetics shows us that genes are programmed to reproduce in a certain way and in no other way. “After its own kind” is how the Bible puts it. Until the day that an evolutionist proposes such an experiment and actually carries it out, proving his hypothesis, the “Theory of Evolution” must be relegated to its proper place: the dungheap. Adaptation is one thing; evolution is quite another.

Actually, given the obvious decline of our civilization, one has to wonder if we are evolving in any sense whatever. Evolution presupposes a steady advance to higher forms. But the “liberal” is an obvious step backwards into devolution. Now, seriously, if you compare a Beethoven symphony to today’s cacophony of rap and hip-hop, we have been in a state of devolution for the last two hundred years. Indeed, every sort of perversion abounds and they call it “good.” Is societal decline “evolution”?

It is simply not enough to say that physical changes in the environment will produce evolutionary changes in our genetic make-up. Some scientist has to demonstrate exactly now these genetic changes are effected. For natural selection to be a valid scientific hypothesis, actual physical, genetic, biochemical experiments must be proposed and carried out in order that the process can be scientifically analyzed. To date, not a single scientific experiment has ever shown any sign of verifying the fable of evolution. And that’s what it is: a Fable. The essence of the evolutionist’s argument is this: “I predict that one or another species will survive.” Are you laughing as hard as I am? We’re supposed to take this stuff seriously? It’s a crime that this nonsense is force-fed to our public school children.

 

Creationism

Creationism is the ultimate trip of taking an English translation of a document and taking that translation completely literally without regard to the meaning of the words in the original language. How a so-called “scientist” – and creationists are scientists – can perpetuate such a blunder is beyond my comprehension. What these creationists are trying to do is make the modern world accept a Medieval translation of Scripture as scientific fact. In order to do this, they must insist that the planet earth is only 6,000 years old.

There are two main problems with this theory: 1.) the sedimentary record proves that the earth is much older, and 2.) the Bible says no such thing. Nowhere does the Bible say that the earth is only 6,000 years old. That is a false deduction based on Archbishop Ussher’s calculations of the life spans of the biblical patriarchs. It completely ignores the problem of where Cain got his wife and how, immediately after being kicked out of the Garden, he built a city and ruled over its people. Where did those people come from? Were they Adamites, pre-Adamites, or non-Adamites? Of course, these are the types of questions that these creationists specifically wish to avoid. The evolutionists wish to avoid them also.

I smell a rat, a rat with lots of money to throw around. The money he throws around distorts the scientific record and it distorts Scripture. The time has come for a serious attempt to resolve natural history and Scripture. Given the solid research that has been done by the Identity researchers mentioned above, and the current level of work being done by those of us following in their footsteps, I have no doubt that we will understand the natural history of this planet; and we will discover that Scripture does not lie. It never has. Theologians lie and scientists lie; but Yahweh does not lie. Nor does His book, the Bible.

Fear them not, therefore: for there is nothing covered that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known.” – Matt. 10:26

There are natural explanations for Joshua’s Long Day, for the Plagues of Egypt, and even for the manna that fell from the sky. Yahweh does not need to violate His own Law in order to awe us with His “miracles.” Yahshua did not violate the Law when He performed His miracles. He did them with the full operation of natural law – law which we do not understand yet because of this false dichotomy between science and religion.

 

The Book of Adam

This is the book of the generations of Adam.” — Gen. 5:1.

When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel. For Yahweh’s portion is his people; Jacob is the lot of his inheritance.” — Deut. 32:8,9.

The Bible is the Book of Adam and his descendants. This absolute fact has been obscured by centuries of universalistic heresy. As much as I admire Martin Luther for his exposure of Papal crimes, he is one of the main guilty culprits. He is the one who promoted “faith over the Law,” a doctrine which is clearly unscriptural. With the so-called “Age of Enlightenment,” the Bible took serious hits. The early period of the scientific era seemed to make the Bible obsolete. The Scopes Trial rang the death knell of biblical exegesis. The Fable of Evolution reared its ugly head. The Skeptics had a field day lambasting the Bible-believers. Unfortunately for the Bible scholars, archeology had not yet caught up with the historicity of the Bible. From a cultural perspective, the old adage, “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing,” obtained around the world. And, just within the last 60 years or so, the Judeo-Christian heresy proclaimed itself as the only true version of Christianity, with scores of televangelists making up doctrine and perverting the writings of Paul in order to derive the “faith-only” doctrine. And then there are the numerous Jewish perversions of Scripture, starting with the Masoretic text and the Talmud. This tangled ball of twine is a real mess of confusion. It is time that we look carefully at Scripture to see what it is really telling us about life on this planet.

Once we understand that the Bible is the Book of Adam and his descendants, everything falls into place. History becomes understandable. Jewish violations of God’s Law and their crimes against the Anglo-Saxon world glare out at us like the monstrous acts of genocide they really are. Usury is seen in its treacherous light. The Gospel of the Kingdom stands out against the phony gospel of “personal salvation.” The Kinsman Redeemer comes to redeem his fallen kinsmen. The battle between the evil seed and the holy seed plays itself out. The Judgment Day comes to separate the wheat from the tares.

 

The Adamic Seedline

The Bible clearly spells out two main seedlines: 1.) the Adamites and 2.) the Canaanites. Although it is possible to lump all non-Adamites under the label, ‘Canaanites,’ we need not concern ourselves with other specific races. The fact is that the descendants of Cain started out racially mixed. It is the mongrelization of species that is of main concern to us. Throughout the Bible, Israel, God’s servant people, is admonished not to race-mix with other peoples. The fact that this clear Law has been avoided and ignored by mainstream Christianity is a scandal, par excellence. The various modern heresies of Christianity, such as Catholicism, Protestantism, Anglicanism, Judeo-Christianity, Fundamentalism, etc., all now promote race-mixing as if there were never a biblical injunction against it. We have to point out to these people that the idea of race-mixing was considered evil throughout all of history, and by all peoples except the Jews, until about the last fifty or sixty years. It was during this time that the Jews took over our media and began to influence our denominational churches through televangelism with their promotion of race-mixing for White Christians while promoting cultural exclusivity for themselves. If you cannot see through this blatant hypocrisy, then you do not have eyes to see.

In effect, the Jews have usurped the “chosen people” doctrine for their own breed of mixed-race people from the true chosen people, Christian Israel. Whenever they can, they call themselves “Israel,” but they never meet the biblical definition, which is “a chosen race.” The Jews are not a race. They are mongrelization objectified in a people. They always have been. No mongrels are to be allowed in the congregation of Israel. This is Yahweh’s Law. The Jews are the living representation of this broken Law. They are the evil seed. And because our people have forgotten this Law, they tolerate the Jews and their Satanic religion in spite of all evidence that their religion is evil. But this is the nature of the enmity, isn’t it? True Israel has forgotten her identity while the impersonator has taken over Israel’s inheritance. In order to hide their enmity for us, they pretend to be us. Very clever, isn’t it? And our people are oblivious to the charade that is going on.

They are wise as serpents and full of guile, while we are guileless as doves and blind as bats.

Matthew, Chapter 1 and Luke Chapter 3 give us Jesus Christ’s line of descent. It is Scriptural proof that Yahshua is a 100% White Adamite and a Shemite and an Israelite of the tribe of Judah. Throughout the ancient world, Adamites and Shemites were described as Nordic in appearance. They were not slanted-forehead, hook-nosed Jews as the Canaanites were. “The show of their countenance doth witness against them.” Jews and other mongrels are easily recognized by their facial characteristics. Although some Jews appear Nordic, they are usually converted Jews, not genetic Jews. They may practice the religion called Judaism, but they are not literal descendants of Cain. And it is clear to me that the Dispensationalist heresy, which teaches that the Jews were the original Israelites, was designed to obscure our true history. The Dispensationalists teach that the Jews failed in their mission, whatever that may have been, and the “Church Age” of Christianity took the place of the Jews. The problem is that the Bible teaches no such thing. On the contrary, Scripture tells us that Jacob/Israel will NOT be destroyed, though he will be divorced and punished for a while. The purpose of Dispensationalism is to hide the fact that Israel is still the Covenant people; and that people is the Caucasian race.

Here are the children of Adam as the Bible clearly spells it out:

Yahweh begat
Adam, who begat
Seth,
Enos,
Cainan I
Maleleel,
Jared,
Enoch, the 7th Son from Yahweh, who begat
Methuselah,
Lamech,
Noah, the 10th generation of pure descent from Yahweh,
Shem, the 11th, the partriarch of the Shemites or Semites,
Arphaxad,
Cainan II, or Kainan (This patriarch is mentioned in the Septuagint, but not in the Masoretic text. This listing is from Luke 3:35,36.)
Shela,
Heber (the patriarch of the Hebrews),
Ragau,
Saruch,
Nahor,
Thera,
Abraham,
Isaac (after whom the Saxons are named),
Jacob (who was renamed Israel and had a twin brother named Esau),
Judah,
Pharez (who had a twin brother named Zarah),
Esrom,
Aram,
Aminadab,
Naasson,
Salmon,
Boaz,
Obed,
Jesse,
David (the originator of the Davidic Dynasty of Kings and Queens),
Nathan,
Mattatha,
Menan,
Melea,
Eliakim,
Jonan,
Joseph I,
Judah II,
Simeon,
Levi I,
Matthat I,
Eliezer,
Jose,
Er (the father of the Irish?),
Elmodam,
Cosam,
Addi,
Melchi I
Neri,
Salathiel,
Zerubabel,
Rhesa,
Johanna,
Judah III,
Joseph II,
Mattathias,
Maath,
Nagge,
Esli,
Nahum,
Amos,
Mattathias II,
Joseph III,
Janna,
Melchi II,
Levi II,
Matthat II,
Eli,
Joseph IV,
Yahshua, the Messiah.

Now, of course, there are those who will say that Joseph was not the real father of Jesus. Not to worry, Matthew gives us Mary’s side of the family, and she is also a pure-blooded Israelite of the tribe of Judah, just as Joseph is; and you can’t get any purer than the Holy Spirit, which is also a reference back to the Garden of Eden where Adam had the “breath of life” breathed into him by Yahweh. So, both Adam and Yahshua were born of the Holy Spirit. This is the “holy seed,” as Scripture records it. Thus, we have irrefutable Scriptural evidence of the seedline of the Adamites.

Once the Israelites came on the scene, the holy seed was named after them. We, the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Caucasian peoples, are that holy seed.

 

The Bloodline of Cain

In this episode, I will not get into any problems of translation or any problems of potential tampering with the original Hebrew text. Here, I merely wish to establish that there are, in fact, two bloodlines, the bloodline of Seth and the bloodline of Cain.

Genesis, Chapter 4 begins with these words: “And Adam knew Eve, his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain…

>From this verse, one would assume that Adam was Cain’s father, but herein hangs a tale of possible Jewish tampering with the text. In the final episode of this series, we will consider this evidence. In the meantime, the fact remains that Cain murdered his brother Abel and was kicked out of the Garden for this crime. He went east into the land of Nod. The word ‘Nod’ is capitalized in the text, but it is questionable whether this is justified.

Strong’s Concordance gives four related words:

5110: nuwd, (pronounced nood, and meaning) to waver: figuratively, to wander, flee, disappear; also (from shaking the head in sympathy), to console, deplore, or (from tossing the head in scorn), to taunt: — bemoan, flee, get, mourn, make to move, take pity, remove, shake, skip for joy, be sorry, vagabond, way, wandering.

[Note the many words here which are associated with Jews and their persecution mythology: “to wander,” “to taunt,” bemoan, mourn, vagabond, wandering, as in the proverbial “wandering Jew.”]

5111: nuwd (Chaldean): to flee: — get away.

5112: nowd or nod (pronounced node): exile: — wandering.

5113: Nowd (also pronounced node)…the same as 5112; vagrancy; Nod, the land of Cain:– Nod.

I suggest that the proper definition of the word, ‘nod,’ is “nomad.”

After taking a Nodite to wife, she bears his first son, Enoch. Genesis, 4 gives us this genealogy:
Cain
Enoch
Irad (Probably the founder of nations himself: note the philological similarity to ‘Iraq’ and ‘Iran’.)
Mehujael
Methusael
Lamech

Lamech had two wives, Adah and Zilah.

(Note that Genesis 4 fails to list Adam as the father of Cain. If Adam were indeed the father of Cain, why such an oversight? One possible conclusion is that Adam is not listed as Cain’s father because he is not his father! Laurence Gardner, in his book, Realm of the Ring Lords, a book about the genealogies of the most ancient kings and queens and their modern descendants, lists Cain as descended from Eve but, also, does not list Adam as the father. (pp. 324-327.) )

The biblical genealogy continues:

Lamech

 

(Adah)

(Zilah)

Jabal and Jubal

Tubalcain

 

At this point it is important to state that it is these Cainite people and their descendants that comprised the half?breed ruling class which ruled over the indigenous people of Sumeria and Babylon. The Adamites and, later, the Israelites, were forbidden to intermarry with these and other peoples. It is also these same Cainite people (descendants of Cain who became known as Canaanites) who bear the enmity against the Adamites.

From the Two-Seedline perspective, the following partial genealogies are contrasted, showing the distinctions between Adamites and Cainites:

Evolution of the Two Seedlines

God of Truth, Yahweh

God of Lies, Lucifer

Adam

Eve

Nachash

Seth

Cain

Jacob/Israel

Esau/Edom

Jesus

Pharisees

Christians

Jews

 

Another erroneous conjecture about Scripture is that all the people of the world drowned in Noah’s flood and that, therefore, all of the human races come from Noah’s three sons, Ham, Shem, and Japheth. The Hebrew word, ‘erets’, can be translated either as ‘earth’ or ‘land’ and these words are rarely used to denote the entire earth. (In Strong’s Concordance, the word ‘erets’, #776, has the following meanings: “..country, earth, field, land, ground…wilderness, world.” The last entry of any dictionary definition is usually the least common meaning.) Also, Genesis 4:14 tells us quoting Cain, that “thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth…” Here, again, the word is ‘erets.’ Obviously, he was not driven off the planet. Given the human penchant for exaggeration, the translators of the KJV probably indulged here somewhat.

The two most reasonable readings are that 1.) the flood was a major one, but confined to the Tarim Basin. There, the rains were mightily supplemented by an upwelling of water from underground due to earthquakes (see Dr. Wesley Swift’s analysis entitled The Races and the Flood, a taped lecture available from the New Christian Crusade Church, POB 426, Metarie, LA 70004), or 2.) the flood was world-wide but was most severe where these Adamites lived.

Certainly, not all of the world’s birds, nor the species of beasts of Africa, Australia, America and others unknown to Noah were passengers on the Ark. If all the known species were on the Ark, their migration from the Ark’s landing site would have to be traceable and proven. Bones of kangaroos would have been found in the Middle East if “all” of the world’s animals were represented. What did they do? Hop all they way to Australia as soon as they were let loose? Add to this fact the additional fact that Noah housed two of each species on the Ark, we are looking at a ship that would have had to carry millions of animals plus many months of food for them all! The difficulties of maintaining this dubious thesis are incredible! We can only conclude that when Genesis 6 speaks of “all flesh that have the breath of life” being destroyed in the earth/land, it is speaking of a particular region of the globe, but not the entire globe. That portion is most certainly and most specifically the area inhabited by the Adamites at that time. And Dr. Swift refers to the archeological evidence which puts the Adamites in the Tarim Basin of southwestern Mongolia at that time.

Genesis 6:9 also tells us that Noah was “perfect in his generations.” The word ‘generations’ is translated from Strong’s # 8435, toledah, meaning “descent.” Hence, Noah was pure White, but the people of the area who were being judged were being judged for the sin of race-mixing, begetting evil seed and practicing their abominable religions. Yahweh’s purpose in sending the Flood was to eliminate the race-mixers. In other episodes, we shall see that the planet Earth had already been previously judged for this crime and Earth will be judged again for the same crime.

Ongoing archeological research demonstrates that numerous mummies of normal-sized human beings are scattered all over western Mongolia, especially in Xinjiang Province of Western China, in the Tarim Basin. These mummies are the remains of so-called Caucasians! Thus we have clear evidence that White people inhabited that area in ancient times, exactly where Dr. Swift tells us we would find them. Some of these mummies are so well preserved that their white skin, blond hair and blue eyes are evident. Some of these mummies are dressed in plaid clothing, a fact that those of Irish and Scottish descent might find interesting!

The Book of Joshua, Chapter 24, verses 2-15, makes several references to the flood. Joshua distinctly and repeatedly refers to this flood as being local in nature. On four occasions, Joshua refers to specific events happening on the “other side of the flood“, thus proving conclusively from Scripture that “the flood” was notglobal in nature. Consequently, the Book of Joshua gives credence to Dr. Swift’s analysis and assertion that the flood was not limited to but was especially severe near the Tarim Basin of South-Central Asia, north of India and northeast of Mesopotamia.

To assert that all races descended from Noah contradicts the archaeological evidence as well as the genetic code, the moral laws of the Bible, and the evidence of the Book of Joshua. The Bible names the descendants of Noah’s sons. To this day, none of them are of different races, nor does all knowledge of the science of genetics permit them to be.

Ignorant preachers teach that Negroes descended from Ham, a pure White son of Noah! But where did the Chinese come from? What about the Amerindians, the Tahitians, Eskimoes and native Australians. If Noah’s three sons mutated into different races [shades of evolution and a violation of “after its own kind”], how did they get from Mesopotamia to these far distant lands? Why did none of their members remain in the Middle East? Why is there no sign of their presence?

The Hebrew word, ‘Adam,’ means “to show blood in the face“, that is, to be able to blush. This clearly indicates that the Adamites were pre-Israelite White people. To argue that Blacks, Orientals, and others evolved from Noah is to insist on a narrow interpretation of the Bible which is both contradicted by other Bible teachings and unable to stand up to scientific criticism. It is, quite simply, nonsense, which sprang up during the Middle Ages. The Biblical insistence on racial purity and the separateness of Israel would be pointless in view of such an interpretation.

We have already traced the bloodline of Shem. If you are an Anglo-Saxon, Shem is your direct progenitor. If you are a Jew, the blood in your veins contains either zero genetic material from Shem, or you have some of his genetic material plus the genetic material of any number of other ethnic groups and races. Since the Jews are not a pure race, but a breed of mixed blood, they cannot be Shemites. Their claim of being of Semitic descent is Scripturally invalid. And the rabbis know it is.

Let us also consider what happened to the brothers of Shem, Ham and Japheth, his Adamite brothers.

Genesis, Chapter Ten tells us that Japheth had seven sons: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech, and Tiras. Gomer, son of Japheth, had three sons: Ashkenaz, Riphath, and Togarmah. Ashkenaz is the patriarch of the Ashkenazim, who are still known by that name today as a major branch of Jewry. Notice that, as the descendants of Japheth, they are not Shemites. The Ashkenazim converted to the religion of Judaism in the 8th Century, A.D. This religious conversion did not provide them with Shemitic genes. Today, 95% of the world’s Jews are descended originally from Ashkenaz, not from the Canaanites, although these two bloodlines have mixed much through the last 1200 years.

Javan had four sons: Elishah, Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim. Note that many of the names given in these genealogies have survived into the 20th Century either as territorial names or as ethnic names or both. Verse 5 refers to these people as having divided amongst themselves the territories of the “Gentiles,” that is, the pre-existing nations around them.

The sons of Ham: Cush, Mizraim, Phut, and Canaan.

The sons of Cush: Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah, and Sabtechah.

In the early history of the Adamites, intermarriage between the descendants of the sons of Noah was not prohibited as long as they were not of mixed blood. Hence, the Queen of Sheba was most likely a pure-blooded Adamite at that time. Only later did race-mixing dilute the Adamic bloodline in Egypt, Ethiopia and other areas where our people once ruled.

Cush begat Nimrod, who was “a mighty one in the earth,” a powerful monarch.

In this tenth chapter, we see the names of many of those nations and peoples which were to become Israel’s enemies: Babel (Babylon), Asshur (Assyria), Philistim, Canaan, the Jebusites, Amorites, Girgasites, Hivites, etc. “...and afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread abroad.” – vs. 18. (See also Psalm 83.)

It is important to realize that some of the descendants of Shem also became part of the peoples who eventually became known by the umbrella term, ‘Canaanites.’ One of these families is that of theSephardim, presently the other major branch of Jewry, who apparently got their name from the area of the mountain named Sephar. These people were Shemites, but not Israelites. They cannot even be considered Abrahamites, in spite of the fact that they make this claim, because the Sepharites (Sephardim) are only cousins of Abraham, not his descendants. (Of course, today, the entire class of Middle Eastern (non-Ashkenazi) Jews is referred to as the Sephardim.)

W.G. Finlay, in issue #10 of the Covenant Answering Service, sums it up this way: “A Jew, whether Sephardic or Ashkenazic, cannot, from evidence to hand be called an Israelite, this term in scriptural definition identifying one who is descended from Jacob/Israel and NONE OTHER.” – p. 2.

Recall the foregoing syllogism: All Israelites are Shemites, but not all Shemites are Israelites. Indeed, the Israelites comprised only a portion of the descendants of Shem; but, without a doubt, the Israelites are the Covenant People upon whom the blessings were bestowed. The other Shemites either intermarried with the surrounding Canaanites or, perhaps, kept to themselves but still have no part in the Covenant bestowed to Jacob/Israel.

We thus begin to see the genealogical nature of the Canaanites, the historical and racial ancestors of the people today known as Sephardic Jews. Jacob’s brother, Esau, married two Canaanite women and thus violated the laws against intermarriage. By this act, he repudiated his share of the Covenant. “…thus, Esau despised his birthright.” Gen. 25:34. (‘Birthright’ is Strong’s word # 1062, meaning primogeniture, or the right of the firstborn.) Read Genesis, Chapters 26 and 27 to get the full flavor of the race-mixing crimes of Esau, “which were a grief of mind unto Isaac and Rebekah,” his parents.

As we can see from tracing the names of these historical families and tribes, much animosity toward Israel came from the mixed descendants of Ham. The extent to which these Hamites, Japhethites, and non-Israelite Shemites intermarried with the Chaldeans (Sumerians) and others is not so important as the fact that, whether they intermarried or not, they have no claim to the Abrahamic Covenant.

The blessing given to Abraham (“I will make of thee a great nation [Hebrew: goy]...And I will bless them that bless thee, and curseth him that curseth thee...(12:2,3)) applies only to his direct descendants through his wife, Sarah, and through Isaac and Rebekah. And this logically excludes both the Ashkenazim and the Sephardim. The fact that they might be near or distant cousins is not good enough. The serpent-seed Jews use the word ‘goy’ deceitfully to mean “non-Jew.” Scripture never uses the word in this way. The word ‘Jew’ was not even a part of our language until the 1500’s A.D. and the people today known as Jews did not even come into being until 150 B.C. These people originated as half-breed Judeans, not pure-blooded Judahites.

In addition to these non-Israelite or Sephardic Canaanites, the other descendants of Esau (Edom) must be figured. Genesis, Chapter 36 tells us how Esau settled in the land of Canaan and dwelt at Mount Seir. Esau/Edom had two sons: Eliphaz and Reuel.

And the sons of Eliphaz were Teman, Omar, Zepho, and Gatam, and Kenaz.” – Gen. 36:11. By a concubine, Eliphaz had Amalek. (The Amalekites were to become the fiercest enemies of Israel.) The sons of Reuel were Nahath, Zerah, Shammah, and Mizzah.

You should be aware that the Jews admit their Canaanite heritage (“Edom is in Jewry” – Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925, Volume 5, p.41); and it is demonstrated by Scripture that Israel’s leaders and prophets endeavored at all times to keep Israel distinct from the Canaanites. Esau married into the Canaanites. We thus have conclusive Scriptural proof that the Jews, who are obviously non-White, are not Israelites. They are descended from Canaanites and Edomites. And the history of Judea just before the time of Christ shows that the Idumean tribe of these Canaanites surreptitiously overcame the tribe of Judah when Antipater, through his behind the scenes deals with Rome, wrested civil and religious power from Hyrcanus III, the last true Judahite to rule over Judah. Antipater’s Idumean son was Herod the Great, the very same viper who committed mass infanticide of Israelites in an attempt to murder Jesus. Herod went so far as to destroy the genealogical records of the house of Judah because he knew he could not demonstrate his Judahite heritage. He was an Edomite Jew but not a Judahite.

With that beginning, the great impersonation of Israel by Canaan-Edom-Ashkenaz developed into what it is today, with Zionism trying to force its terrible and ignoble will upon the innocent peoples of the world and deceiving the Christian world into believing that they, the Jews, are “God’s chosen people.” One of the principal excuses Zionism gives in its gigantic charade and illegal occupation of Palestine is that the Jews are the supposed descendants of Israel. The fact that the Khazarian Jewish leaders know that this claim is false is all the more reason to condemn them, for they are brash to the point of murder, terrorism, and genocide.

Their brashness is confirmed in Isaiah 4:9: “The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves.

Reverend Bertrand L. Comparet, in his booklet, The Good Figs and the Bad Figs, has this to say regarding the show of the Jewish countenance: “...all the ancient monuments that show Israelites show a straight-nosed, typically Anglo-Saxon face; and the monuments which show the Canaanites, from the Hittites in the north, way up into Turkey, on down through the various Canaanite peoples living in Palestine, they all show hook-nosed, typically Jewish faces.” – p. 13. (This hook-nosed, receding forehead type of countenance goes all the way back to the Sumerians, who were the first people to be ruled by Cain. This facial type is still dominant within Jewry today. For a simple demonstration, compare the profiles of Grace Kelly, a Shemite, and Barbra Streisand, a Sephardic Jew.)

Neither do they hide their sins: Anti-White and anti-Christian causes, such as abortion, secular humanism, Judeo-Christianity in the churches, Freemasonry, homosexuality, miscegenation, pornography, incest, atheism, etc., are all openly and vigorously pursued and publicly promoted by various representatives of Jewry. It is only the blind and thoroughly indoctrinated who either cannot see this or refuse to see it. But, of course, this is nothing but the fulfillment of the prophecy that Satan would deceive the whole world:

And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.” — Rev. 12:9.

The fundamentalists will try to tell you that this is a reference to the Papacy and the Catholic Church, but this deceiver was present in the Garden of Eden. The Papacy didn’t exist until after 300 A.D. The Papacy is only a part of his empire.

It is obvious that the world, thanks to the internet, is waking up to Jewish treachery. Because of Jewish lobbying, virtually all governments in the world, with the exception of the United States and Muslim countries, have made criticism of the Jews illegal. Don’t you think that it is odd that it is OK to criticize God, Jesus Christ, Mahatma Ghandi, George Bush, and anyone else; but if you criticize a Jew, you can go to jail for it? Don’t these anti-anti-Semites know the meaning of the word ‘oppression’? – or better yet: ‘persecution’? Isn’t it oppression of a people to tell them what they can or cannot say in public – and put them in jail for disagreeing with you? They keep claiming to be the victims of “persecution,” but they’re always promoting it against their critics. What will it take for the sleeping sheep to realize that the “victim” is really the perpetrator, par excellence. It is history’s most enormous con-job pulled off by the world’s most experienced con-men: the Talmudic rabbis. These modern-day Pharisees have been perfecting the art of deception for the last 2150 years.

Some disinterested parties like to say: “So what! What difference does all of this ancient history make? What is the relevance to the modern world? These are different times.”

Reginald Dunlop, author of The Coming Russian Invasion of America, 1978, puts it this way:

Present day World tensions, between the Free Western World and the anti-God, anti-Christ enemies of freedom, stem from an age-old enmity, which has existed since the dawn of recorded history.” — p. 45.

I say: You cannot understand the present unless you understand the past.

The enmity is heating up.

 

Conclusion.

Because the modern political climate imposed on the world by Zionism has declared any discussion of race to be taboo, articles such as this are rejected out of hand as “anti-Semitism.” Any criticism of Jewry is automatically smeared as “anti-Semitism.” We should know better. The hypocrisy of this position, given Jewish insistence that THEY are the people of the Book and deserve special treatment, is too glaring and obvious to be ignored. Yet, most Judeo-Christians give them the benefit of the doubt, believing the BIG LIE that Yahweh endorses their cultural chauvinism. The rabbis of Judaism and the false priests of Judeo-Christianity have pulled the wool over our eyes; and we are blind and dumb.

They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones [the lost sheep of the House of Israel]. They [the impostors] have said, Come, let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance [among its true heirs]. For they have consulted together with one consent; they are confederate against thee.” — Psalm 83. Crafty counsel! Hmmm. Sort of sounds like a conspiracy, doesn’t it? Need I put the word ‘Jewish’ in front of the word ‘conspiracy’?

Although some members of the Christian Identity Movement insist that Cain was fathered by Adam, not Nachash, I intend to demonstrate that Cain’s father was indeed someone other than Adam. That demonstration will be reserved for Part 6.

In the meantime, I will leave you with this tantalizing quotation:

For this is the message that ye have heard from the beginning, that we should love one another. Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother.” — I John 3:11,12.

The Bible conclusively demonstrates that there are two seedlines emanating from the Garden of Eden: that of Seth and that of Cain. These two seedlines are easily distinguished from one another and have been documented in this article. Throughout most of history, they were known as Israelites and Canaanites. They are today known as the Caucasians and the Jews. Jewish enmity toward the Caucasians is a demonstrable, historical fact. Their hatred of Christ and Christianity is just as obvious, but our people have been blinded by propaganda and cannot see the obvious. The enmity of Genesis 3:15 still exists between these two seeds. One is the holy seed. The other is the evil seed. Our religion, Christianity, is the religion of Truth. Their religion, Judaism, is the religion of deception. There can be no greater enmity than between truth and lies.

The Bible clearly records that Cain was the progenitor and his sons the founders of several mixed nations. What is still in question is whether Cain himself was a half-breed proto-Jew or a 100% Adamite. There is no doubt that Cain and Abel came out of the same womb; but did they have the same father?

(End of Part One. Part Two will deal with Earth’s first punishment for the crime of race-mixing. It will be entitled, “The Fall of Atlantis.”)

 

http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/content/part-1-two-bloodlines