Biblical proof that non-Whites are outside the genome of Awdawm (H119 & H120, “to show blood in the face”) and that we are NOT to mix with them.

 

We are NOT to convert them to OUR faith:  “Cast ye not pearls before swine, lest they turn again and rend you.”

From Pastor Comparet:  Adam Was Not the First Man

BEAST OF THE FIELD, by Pastor Eli James

“Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which Yahweh Elohim had made.”

  • Genesis 3:1. 

 

Children of Israel, there is a dispute within Two-Seedline concerning the “beast of the field” and the “beast of the earth.”  Virtually all Two-Seedliners consider the “beast of the field” to be a reference to non-White hominids (humanoids that walk on two legs).   As an example of this opinion, I have provided links, at the end of this essay, including Jason Blaha’s “Beast With a Hand?” which elaborates on this position.  However, there seems to be some confusion on this point, so I have decided that a thorough word study is in order.   Up until now, all Two-Seedliners I have studied agree that the other races were already in existence when Adam and Eve were formed in the Garden of Eden.  For example, Dr. Wesley Swift taught that all of the non-White races existed for eons before Adam was created in the Genesis account.   With this statement, I totally agree.  Also, according to Swift, the White Race is only 6,000 years old.  Bertrand Comparet and Sheldon Emry also believed this.   In my opinion, however, the White Race, although the last in the order of creation, is very much older.   Since the Genesis 1 account is dealing with eons (Hebrew yowm), not literal days, we must strive to harmonize the language of Genesis 1-4 with natural history.  My Enmity Series goes into great detail about these eons and the order of creation.  The Enmity Series can be found at www.anglo-saxonisrael.com .

Within Christian Identity, there is no dispute that the Adamites were exclusively White and that the other races are separate species, which cannot be equated with or derived from the Adamites.  Nobody in Identity teaches that all of the races “evolved” or descended from the two individuals, Adam and Eve.  But this is what Judaism and the Judeo-Christian churches teach, so the vast majority of religious people believe this.  However, no archeologist believes this, because the fossil record clearly shows that hominid fossils of all the known races are common, well before 4,000 BC.  This includes Cro-Magnon (Caucasoid) fossils and artifacts.   Mummies dated to 5,000 BC have been found in Peru; and the archeology of pre-agricultural communities in Mesopotamia clearly predates Adam and Eve.  The era of the dinosaurs and megafauna, such as mammoths, saber-tooth tigers, giant sloths and giant beavers, also precedes Adam and Eve; and human remains have been found in mass graves with mammoths and giant elk.

In my Enmity Series, I have suggested an alternative reading of Genesis 1-4, which takes the fossil record into account.   My thesis is that the Adamic Race was created in Genesis 1:26-27 and that Genesis 2 is talking about the individual person, Adam, and his wife, Eve.  Most Identists are of the opinion, as expressed by Dr. Swift, that Adam and Eve were the first Whites.  I cannot accept this doctrine, because it is opposed by the fossil record.  They were the first Adamites, but not the first Caucasoids.  My thesis is that Gen. 1:26-7 are referring to the creation of our Race and that Gen. 2 is talking about a later development, some time after the creation of the Race in Gen. 1.  This specific episode is localized in the Garden of Eden.  This thesis regards the events of Gen. 2 as chronologically after the events of Gen. 1.  This chronological interpretation of the Genesis account fits the fossil record and the known archeology.

So, to restate the case, the specific doctrine is this:  Genesis 1:26-27 are talking about the creation of the White Race, but Gen. 2 is talking about the more localized and later events that took place in the Garden of Eden.  For me, this is the only interpretation that makes historical and Scriptural sense.

After I published this thesis (http://anglo-saxonisrael.com/site/node/181 ), many people wrote to me saying that this idea had also occurred to them, but that no one had ever expressed it before in writing.   Swift’s thesis, which assumes a 4,000 BC creation date for the Adamic Race,  was based upon the known archeology of the time, which was dominated by the theory of evolution, which states that all of the races “evolved” from some black lady umpteen million years ago.  All Identists reject the fable of evolution as un-Scriptural and unscientific.  The problem is how to reconcile the fossil record with the language of Scripture.

I believe I have done this in the Enmity series; but not all in Identity share my views.  Some adhere to the doctrine shared by Swift, Comparet and Emry, which is based upon the back-dating method of Archbishop Ussher (Masoretic time scale), which results in a “creation date” of 4,000 BC.  The orthodox, Judeo-Christian view is that all of the races were created at the same time.  But this view has the inevitable problem of “Where did Cain get his wife, if the only humans alive were Adam, Eve and Cain?”  No other humans are recorded as existing at this time in Scripture, or so they believe.

Also, Cain, as he was being ejected from the Garden after killing Abel, states, “Behold, you have driven me out this day from the face of the land; and from Your face shall I be hidden; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the land; and it shall come to pass, that everyone that finds me shall slay me.” (Gen. 4:14.)  Who are these “everyone,” if not the humanoids living outside of the Garden?  Hence, in verse 15, a mark is placed upon Cain, so that those others will not kill him.  Cain was obviously afraid that others would take vengeance upon him.  The idea that there were no other humanoids on the planet at this time is simply foolish.  Of course, there were.   They are not specifically named, but their presence is implied by the words, ‘everyone’ and “the land of Nod,” where Cain found a ‘wife’ and “built a city.”   Where did she come from and who helped Cain and his wife build the city?   Rather than deal with such historical questions, the rabbis of Judaism and the Judeo-Christian theologians ignore them, teaching that all races descended from the unions between Adam and Eve and their subsequent offspring.  However, Cain’s wife is not specified as one of those offspring.   Cain found her in a completely different territory, before Adam and Eve could have had any other children.  So, the conventional view fails for many reasons.

 

To read the entire sermon, go to:

http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/content/beast-field